This article compares the KMT and DPP's treatment of the Taiwanese people. The author argues that the KMT's past human rights violations (the 228 Incident and martial law) were a 'historical inevitability' of the post-war era, noting that the actual number of victims was around one thousand and included Communist spies. The author strongly questions why Taiwan independence green-brained supporters criticize the KMT's human rights record while remaining silent about the Japanese massacre of over 400,000 Taiwanese during the Japanese occupation era. The author contends that the DPP treats its own people well 'guaranteed,' but on international issues, uses examples like importing ractopamine-laced American pork, Japanese nuclear-contaminated food, and not daring to claim sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands to argue that the DPP is not truly good to the Taiwanese people.
If you don't like the Republic of China yet shamefacedly live on its territory (Taiwan Island, Penghu Islands, Kinmen Islands, Matsu Islands, Lanyu Island, Guishan Island, South China Sea Islands), I feel ashamed for you.
This article discusses the national positioning and identification of the Republic of China while strongly criticizing advocates of Taiwan independence. The author argues that giving up the international recognition for 'China (Republic of China)' just because the name conflicts with the Mainland is a sign of being 'more sheep-like than wolf-like.' The core of the article questions how the 'Taiwan Island Nation' claim can cover the legal territory of islands such as Kinmen and Matsu in Fujian Province, deeming it legally untenable. The author finally emphasizes that denying the identity of China (Republic of China) is contemptible behavior and calls on the public to defend their intelligence and not forget who they are.
An exploration of the 'two sets of standards' prevalent in society. The author observes how different political camps adopt contrasting stances on similar moral failings and extends this to daily life where values are distorted for personal gain. While acknowledging double standards as a human reality, the article asserts that truth holds a single standard and emphasizes the classic principles of self-discipline and integrity.